3/31/2024 0 Comments Expert testimony![]() ![]() The provisions of this Rule 701 amended November 2, 2001, effective January 1, 2002, 31 Pa.B. 6384 (November 24, 2001).įinal Report explaining the Janurescission and replacement published with the Courts Order at 43 Pa.B. No change in the current practice was intended with the elimination of this term.Īdopted May 8, 1998, effective Octoamended November 2, 2001, effective Janurescinded and replaced January 17, 2013, effective March 18, 2013.įinal Report explaining the November 2, 2001, amendments published with the Courts Order at 31 Pa.B. Within Article VII, the term inference has been eliminated when used in conjunction with opinion. The term inference is subsumed by the broader term opinion and Pennsylvania case law has not made a substantive decision on the basis of any distinction between an opinion and an inference. On January 17, 2013, the Rules of Evidence were rescinded and replaced. (c) not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge within the scope of Rule 702. (b) helpful to clearly understanding the witnesss testimony or to determining a fact in issue and (a) rationally based on the witnesss perception If a witness is not testifying as an expert, testimony in the form of an opinion is limited to one that is: Rule 701. Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses. Disclosing the Facts or Data Underlying an Experts Opinion. ARTICLE VII. OPINIONS AND EXPERT TESTIMONY ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |